Cleopatra

The teacher is not a very tough grader. confining summary of her career, but made little use of the unproblematic source available (Plutarch) The word-painting entitled Cleopatra presents a fairly accurate portrayal of the events that transpired from 48 B.C. to 44 B.C in Romanist floor. From the defeat of Pompey at Pharsalus to Caesars assassination, the image does a rightfulness job of presenting the material events of the period. The second half of the movie from 44 B.C. to 30 B.C., does not accurately depict the events that occurred. This segment basically dissolves into a love life story, and does not illustrate the actual history of that time. The creators of this movie did have evidence to back up the love interest between Cleopatra and Anthony,and needed to make the movie interest to modern audiences.         There appears to be some confinement to grab the performers to the actual countenance of Caesar, Anthony, Cicero and Octavian. Howe ver, they failed in casting Elizabeth Taylor as Cleopatra. Elizabeth Taylor does not resemble the little that is known of the real Cleopatras appearance. From studying her substitution class on coins and reading the descriptions written by ancient writers, the boilers suit impression of Cleopatra is not one of a beautiful muliebrity. The customary appearance of Cleopatra is one of a woman with large eyes, a long hooked nose, a earlier prominent chin, and with whisker in a bun at the nape of the neck. Elizabeth Taylor does not fit this description. The ancient writers reveal Cleopatra as possessing great intelligence,charm,wit, and linguistic skills. There are not some scenes in this movie that show Cleopatras great intelligence, wit, or her charm. The movie states that she was proficient in seven languages, but in actuality she could hold forth in octette languages. The only way in which Elizabeth Taylor... If you necessitate t o get a full essay, order it on our website:! OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper