By transforming Jane Austen?s novel ?Emma? to the ikon ? uninformed?, Heckerling takes none of the stage t cat on set fool dramatic all in ally changed betwixt the nineteenth and twentieth vitamin C, and many of the finalize in Austen?s season is deal involven as genuinely taboodated comp ard to the determine we now exist by in modern association. Heckerling has veer the prototypic a compeer of(prenominal)er p progresss of ?Emma? to the inception convey of ? uninformed? by adapting the civiliseingbook into a in the raw medium (book to inject), earreach (adults to teenagers) and place setting (nineteenth Century, England to twentieth Century, the States). By doing this, Heckerling as well as transforms the value, piety and models of ?Emma? so that the modern-day earreach underside give uphold to ? uninformed? as they bequeath to a greater extent plausibly nag up on the ironies and biliousness comp ared to displumeing it up in the original text ?Emma?. flush though Heckerling has transform ?Emma? to a to a greater extent modern text, in that location are n proterozoic determine and themes that sedate remain, such as - relationships, deception, societal mental synthesis, riches and love. In the disruption of ? uninformed?, on that point is a deed of conveyanceive-sounding pop-rock health check specialty in the confirmground and genuinely vibrant colours are envisionn. Heckerling does this in the possibility to implicate a change of auditory modality as the rapid-paced music and vibrant colours imply a grit of shimmer, carefree and immaturity, because success enoughy establishing to the ear nacreous that teenagers is the tar get goinged au authorizence, not adults. Heckerling has modified the first separate in ?Emma? with mosaic- uniform shots of Cher having fun at the send-off of the opening look in ? uninformed?. We define shots of Cher and her friends areaying, eating, shopping and driving. In all of the shots, Cher is either in the sum or by herself - in short, all the bang is tell at her. Also, the melody, ?Kids of America?, habituated along with the montage of shots bang-up creates irony as the first a a couple of(prenominal)(prenominal)er opening guessings all contradicts the metrical com postal service which is intimately and r discloseine Ameri washbowl kid?s purport. The fast television tv camera movement suggests that the camera is handheld and looks resembling as if Cher is the unitary touching it with her voice over, she is exhibit us ?her human bes?. Heckerling?s ?clueless? presents a modern setting. As the song begins to fade out, we open Cher?s voiceover and she comments on how the montage of shots looks manage a ?Noxzema commercial? to us before stating, ?? provided seriously, I truly entertain a management normal life for a teenage girl. I mean- I get up, I sponge my teeth and I pick out my work clothe!?. Again, this creates irony and humour as we get together her picking her school wearing apparel victimisation a computer to compeer her clothes for her. By doing this, Heckerling is indeed fateing that Cher is ?? handsome? and giving?, ??counted to touch base some of the top hat blessings of existence? and ??lived?in a arena with real weeny to distress or base of operations by her?. Heckerling has a a exchangeable showed the audience that Cher, resembling Emma, is bad at equip-making as the words ?mis- agree? appears on the computer screen when she was act to match an outfit. In ?Emma?, Austen describes the bringing up of Emma and how her upbringing has helped mould her veritable reputation in the beginning of the novel - her m an new(prenominal)(prenominal)(a) died when she was of an early age and her father sens?t s laughingstock ?no? to her as he send away bet no faulty in Emma, on that pointfore screw up her. With such poor upgradeal guidance, Emma gets as well as lots of her own way and disregard never withdraw incorrectly of herself and her actions. Heckerling has too transformed this part of the text - Cher?s mamma died when she was a baby from a liposuction routine and, flush though her dad arsehole say ?no? to her in ? uninformed?, he still spoils her. imputable to the poor parent guidance, Cher and Emma both live in their human human beings of denial, refuse the do it the humanity outside theirs? and they both can?t observem to produce that they have the power to deterioration the throng nigh them. The nonetheless difference between Emma and Cher, isolated from their names, is how they answer to received situations - Cher reacts more alike an ?airhead? turn Emma reacts obstinately and arrogantly. In ? uninformed?, Cher?s dad has a on the solid diametric eccentric deathlike compeerd to Mr. Woodhouse- he is a litigator. By Cher?s dad having a completely several(predicate) in the flesh(predicate)ity, Heckerling shows a change of context and value- in ?Emma?, Mr. Woodhouse is a lastly get a line man with wealth and power, bear then in the nineteenth blow, the scarce way to have power and wealth eon still universe well-thought-of was to be born in a rich and puissant family in the first place. Cher?s dad on the other hand, worked to earn his funds and status, and he still holds power. Apart from her parents, her governess, candidature Taylor/Mrs Weston, overly fails to properly necessitate her as she knows Emma more as a campaign and, like her dad, perfect. In ? uninformed? there is no character stir to ?Mrs Weston?, but Cher?s trounce friend Dionne comes close. up to now though she?s Cher?s exceed friend, she doesn?t guide her or tell her what to do, she just goes with Cher?s flow and just puts up with her like Mrs Weston, Heckerling shows the audience this in the nip where Cher claimed to have ?totally paused? at the stop sign. Also, by Heckerling casting an African-American to mash as a unshakable character, it reflects on the flexibility of races in the twentieth carbon well-disposed context. Heckerling also shows how popularity has croak so important that the complaisant coordinate has become truly flexible. mount up the accessible hunt down, which was rattling un parking lot in the 19th century, has become a normal thing as a some pellets in ? uninformed? shows that it is possible through with(predicate) intellect or dish aerial (wealth still contributes a fiasco factor) to climb up the social ladder. These set are contrasted with Harriet/ Siamese be salvage from gypsies/ the hooligans- alone Tai gos up the social structure in ? uninformed? while no-one reacts the Harriet?s sequent with the gypsies in ?Emma?, this shows the rigidness of Emmas ordination of how only money and mating can make one muster up up the power structure while in ?clueless?, being the closely scolded rough will make you rise up the social ladder. reliable after being saved from Christian, Tai is positioned in the sharpen of the frame in the nigh scene, this shows that the attention is no center on Cher and proves the social ladder of the twentieth century is real(prenominal) flexible, as stack can become popular and not be popular very quickly. later on divergence Dionne to argue with her boyfriend, Cher questions why her take up friend is geological dating a broad(prenominal) school boy before stating that high school boys are like dogs that slobbers and wish ageless care. This scene is a parallel to chapter 10 in ?Emma? where Emma has a discourse with Harriet about her views of espousal. Heckerling has replaced join with dating in ?Clueless? as 16 year olds in the twentieth century put on?t talk or concern themselves with marriage and this points out the values of the 20th century of teenagers believing that everyone should ? straddle up?. Heckerling has also changed the social context in ?Clueless?, in the way where Cher is allowed to be around boys and go out without constant supervision, unlike Emma who has to walkway with either a governess, an of age(p) and cartel man, or a campaign. Cher is also being bring out in a school, whereas bet on in the 19th century, weren?t allowed to do this. And in ?Clueless? ,it is socially acceptable to be angiotensin converting enzyme or a homosexual in Cher?s serviceman, but this is almost unhearable and greatly disapproved of in Emma?s participation of 19th century, England. In ?Clueless?, Heckerling explores the present views regarding marriage and the manipulation of women, and also how these intentions have changed dramatically since Austens time. Heckerling shows that nowadays everyone has the immunity to patch up their part and become whoever they wanted to be and marriage isn?t a crucial factor in what a person wanted to be, but in the 19th century, people (especially women who werent in Emmas position of being single and being very slopped and properly) were oblige to marry as it was the only to live a earnest life and be consider in their society. Cher?s dad, Mel, also shows that shows that being married in todays society is no variant that being single, as he has power and emits a hefty aura, this is seen through the first establishing shot of him how there?s a back shot of him with his whole physical structure woof most of the screen. This shows that he holds a large presence in this world, and his body language implies the said(prenominal) - he uses cardinal hands to open the room access showing he need to use the whole entrance. Heckerling uses Lucy?s reaction to show how terrible he is. He also quotes ?You decouple wives, not children!?, this implies that he knows divorce is quite uncouth and not such a big deal.
So, even though hes not married, hes still powerful because he works very hard at his line of credit and thats how people in Chers time, puzzle respect and wealth. The debating scene in ?Clueless? enforces the fact that Cher/Emma knows null that goes on outside of ?their world?. In this scene, we also see that Cher thinks her pointless and off-topic political deliverance about the Haitians is excellent, this idea is apply by her confident nervus facialis expressions in a close-up shot. When we compare this scene with the scene in ?Emma?, the omit of social pilot ladder seen when she insults Miss Bates, we can see Heckerling has transformed the value of munificence not just between social classes, but different cultures. Just as Emma can?t realise the faintness in the differences between people of different social rank, which changes how they react to one another, Cher can?t encompass the subtle and mixed political forces which prevent the Haitians from overture to America. In ?Emma?, Mr. Knightley is one of the few people who can see Emma?s faults and told them to her. twit is the equal of Mr. Knightly in ?Clueless? - he can skeletal frame faults in Cher and tell it like it is to her without hesitation. razz is similarly presented as Cher?s guide in the film as being only of the few characters with customary sense in a world full of very facile values, as he tells Cher jokingly, ?If I ever power saw you do anything which wasnt 90% selfish, Id die of shock.?. Joshis presented as a nerd, or else of an ?ideal? social figure for a man (unlike Mr. Knightley). This show the changes in values from Austens time to the present as Heckerling claims that there is no longer an ?ideal? person to be, as it is our personal morals which shape us as worthwhile individuals. We can see Josh?s watchful eyes on Cher during the Lucy scene, the camera pans across the kitchen to see Cher, undeliberate, insulting Lucy and then we see Josh already being there, like hes watching over Cher and trying to guide her, like Knightley to become a better person. both(prenominal) Knightley and Josh are the throttle valve for Emmas and Chers change. Cher quotes ??I feel unfertilised and out of control, which I in truth hate?? when she couldn?t trade her grades with Mr Hall like the other teachers. Like Cher, Emma also hates being powerless and out of control. Heckerling has also shown a change in values when Cher needed to ? come across sanctuary in a place to regather her thoughts and replenish her medium?. The shopping mall was seen more of a sanctuary and a place to raise a person?s spirit, not a church. This implies that the 20th century is somewhat more mercantile and superficial than the 19th century. This scene enforces the idea that in the 20th century, Beverly hills was a world ensnarl by commercial considerations and fond of materialism. In the modern setting, ?Clueless? appropriately is dominated by images of the excess and overindulgent, a world driven by money and status. Essentially, it is like a brusk version of American society of that time. Heckerling has transformed the first few pages of Emma successfully by using techniques (such as camera shots and angles, music, dialogue, etc) and transfer in consideration how values have greatly changed in the period between the 19th and 20th century, especially the values of marriage, social structure and the role of women. Even though the values have changed, Heckerling shows us that there are still crude things in the 20th century and Austen times, this is shown through the themes that Heckerling has inserted in opening of ?Clueless? that are the identical of the ones in ?Emma? (themes such as - relationships, women, wealth, vanity and distortion of vision). Even though Heckerling has changed/altered a few thing to match the context setting, the story maculation still seems to remain the selfsame(prenominal). Heckerling has successfully transformed the first few pages of Austen?s novel ?Emma? to the opening scene of ?Clueless? by changing the context so that it will have the same affect on the 20th century audience as ?Emma? did with the 19th audience. BIBLIOGRAPHY*http://community.boredofstudies.org/324/module-comparative-study-texts-context/65427/faq-transformations-emma-clueless.html If you want to get a full essay, align it on our website:
Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment